WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:01.280 --> 00:00:07.460
Okay, uh, hello there everyone I'm Parker Glynn Adey I'm an assistant professor at the University of Toronto Mississauga

00:00:08.080 --> 00:00:11.219
And I want to tell you a little bit about my work on geometries

00:00:11.820 --> 00:00:15.200
mathematics for the eyes and hands, uh in this presentation

00:00:15.200 --> 00:00:21.600
We usually hand out physical objects to play with and then we sort of have a bit of a conversation about what thoughts those

00:00:22.240 --> 00:00:24.000
uh objects

00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:25.840
Bring to mind

00:00:25.840 --> 00:00:27.920
but uh, in this case, we'll be we'll be doing with

00:00:28.720 --> 00:00:33.840
Geogebra apps, so I'm happy that you're here. I'm happy you've come out to watch this talk

00:00:34.480 --> 00:00:38.399
And uh, I hope you are sparked with creativity and joy

00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:43.840
And if you do wind up watching this, please uh, tweet out drop me a message on Twitter

00:00:44.480 --> 00:00:46.480
where I can be found

00:00:47.980 --> 00:00:52.559
@pgadey, okay. So I look forward to hearing any thoughts you might have coming out of this

00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:55.840
Uh, yeah, let's begin

00:00:56.800 --> 00:00:58.800
So I'd like to tell you a little bit about

00:00:59.660 --> 00:01:01.759
Geometry, uh, this is in the context

00:01:02.399 --> 00:01:09.838
Of a fourth year mathematics course that I teach at the University of Toronto Mississauga, uh, but it can be done

00:01:10.640 --> 00:01:15.839
At any level all of these activities can be brought down to the high school level brought down to the public school level

00:01:16.320 --> 00:01:19.519
Um, it's really about meeting your students where they're at

00:01:21.040 --> 00:01:22.400
So

00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:25.199
I'm going to talk a little bit about inquiry-based learning the sort of the

00:01:25.740 --> 00:01:31.680
Pedagogical framework that I come from is it's inquiry-based learning where students engage

00:01:32.320 --> 00:01:34.639
with meaningful mathematical tasks, so

00:01:35.520 --> 00:01:38.000
we mean meaningful here in sort of two senses one that

00:01:38.720 --> 00:01:40.959
It should mean something for the students

00:01:42.159 --> 00:01:45.679
You know, they should understand what's going on. They should feel engaged with what's going on

00:01:46.240 --> 00:01:51.939
And also it should tie into the sort of big ideas of mathematics, right? It should be meaningfully

00:01:53.340 --> 00:01:54.399
mathematical

00:01:54.399 --> 00:02:02.079
And uh should you know have broader connections. So we wanted students to engage deeply with meaningful mathematical tasks

00:02:04.479 --> 00:02:08.559
We want students to work collaboratively to process mathematical ideas

00:02:09.679 --> 00:02:12.079
We want to work in groups and share

00:02:13.280 --> 00:02:17.599
one of the things that I think about is really special about geometry is that we can

00:02:19.040 --> 00:02:21.120
So we can hold the objects in our hands

00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:26.660
We can draw objects for each other. We can pass a mathematical object around

00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:29.360
And uh examine it from different angles

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:31.360
and uh

00:02:31.360 --> 00:02:38.080
Sort of we can create a kind of a knowing in a small group of people. So I think that working collaboratively is very important

00:02:39.599 --> 00:02:43.599
Uh, we should we should focus on student thinking right we should see where students are at

00:02:44.239 --> 00:02:48.399
Um as teachers, right? This is sort of a key thing, but it's just important to

00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:52.959
To remember that we should ask students what they believe about these things. Um,

00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:56.319
geometry is sort of special and then a lot of people have

00:02:56.860 --> 00:03:00.559
Intuitions about geometry and we can we can point at things and say stuff

00:03:01.200 --> 00:03:07.039
and uh, this makes the conversation between instructors and students very fruitful and engaging

00:03:09.120 --> 00:03:10.400
And then

00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:18.319
We should always foster equity right? So when we're designing our courses, uh, everyone has ideas about geometry, right? It's a sort of a universal

00:03:19.920 --> 00:03:23.360
Given that we can we can see pattern we can see shape

00:03:23.760 --> 00:03:29.679
So I think that uh, there's a lot of room for fostering equity through this and i'm going to talk a little bit about different

00:03:31.340 --> 00:03:33.340
Mathematical approaches to doing that

00:03:34.239 --> 00:03:39.119
So what is special about geometry right take a moment sort of answer this for yourself

00:03:41.120 --> 00:03:46.480
What's what do you think is special about geometry um and then i'll share a couple of my thoughts

00:03:58.879 --> 00:04:00.879
Right so sort of to reiterate those points

00:04:01.840 --> 00:04:06.259
Um, what's special about geometry? We can make meaningful mathematical tasks

00:04:06.959 --> 00:04:10.899
Uh about pictures things that are very in front of us very accessible

00:04:13.340 --> 00:04:17.380
Um students can share their own mathematical thoughts because we have a lot of sort of mathematical intuitions

00:04:19.600 --> 00:04:25.040
Uh the conversations around geometry often end up being very fruitful and we're going to talk a little bit about this equity piece

00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:26.560
as well

00:04:26.560 --> 00:04:27.120
uh

00:04:27.120 --> 00:04:33.359
So those are some some thoughts about why geometry is particularly special. I want to share one thing that gives you the feel

00:04:33.840 --> 00:04:35.840
What I think with geometry

00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:39.040
I think that geometry is going on right here

00:04:41.360 --> 00:04:46.479
Take a moment and kind of look at the different shapes different things that you're seeing in this picture

00:04:46.960 --> 00:04:49.220
Look at different ways that people are engaging

00:04:50.639 --> 00:04:52.639
in this picture

00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:04.639
I always like to draw people's attention over to this corner of the picture

00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:08.720
Where we've got a student volunteer here

00:05:09.440 --> 00:05:15.999
Who's really focusing on this this child right. The child is absolutely absorbed in their coloring task

00:05:16.960 --> 00:05:20.820
This coloring task i'll talk a little bit about later on in the presentation

00:05:21.520 --> 00:05:26.160
But we can see that there's a some kind of a mathematical experience going on here

00:05:27.580 --> 00:05:29.580
another child

00:05:30.080 --> 00:05:32.240
Assembling some blocks. They're trying to make

00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:37.039
their own pattern and then we've got all of these, uh,

00:05:37.979 --> 00:05:40.179
mathematical tangible objects

00:05:40.880 --> 00:05:43.999
Uh, you know, people are holding these things thinking about them

00:05:44.639 --> 00:05:50.559
Um, they're a little bit excited. You know, they've got all these fun colorful things and I think this is one of the most

00:05:51.199 --> 00:05:54.159
Uh exciting things about geometry. It's tangible

00:05:54.960 --> 00:06:00.639
It's playful and it's often colorful, right it uh sort of has some properties that our usual

00:06:01.280 --> 00:06:06.819
Uh, mathematical subjects, um sort of a lack right? We sort of lack these tangible objects

00:06:09.039 --> 00:06:11.039
So, I think this is sort of a very special

00:06:11.199 --> 00:06:15.459
Thing that geometry can do for us now. I want to talk about where geometry is at in the curriculum

00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:25.919
Right geometry has been sort of uh, relegated to the really the

00:06:26.639 --> 00:06:33.059
Flanks of the curriculum. It's uh sort of looked down upon as kind of being 19th century stuff

00:06:34.880 --> 00:06:42.079
You know actual euclidean geometry, we don't see very much of it. we talk about, you know, classifications of different shapes

00:06:42.720 --> 00:06:45.039
Uh, we do some sort of two column proofs

00:06:45.919 --> 00:06:48.478
but there's so much more to geometry than

00:06:49.039 --> 00:06:51.839
uh, this kind of dusty old picture would suggest and I want to

00:06:52.400 --> 00:06:57.039
Come back and talk about why this specific thing would be very interesting to play with with students

00:06:57.360 --> 00:06:59.360
and talk about some of the ways that we

00:06:59.440 --> 00:07:01.440
play with it in our class

00:07:04.400 --> 00:07:08.880
Just uh just as a bit of a sort of historical aside, uh, this model was made in

00:07:09.419 --> 00:07:10.479
1864

00:07:10.479 --> 00:07:12.479
Came to Brown University in 1973

00:07:13.360 --> 00:07:14.639
and uh

00:07:14.639 --> 00:07:16.639
that's sort of when it left the

00:07:17.340 --> 00:07:20.560
university scene it's been sitting in the Smithsonian ever since this was a

00:07:21.280 --> 00:07:22.880
uh

00:07:22.880 --> 00:07:28.719
A model built to demonstrate a particular concept in geometry. And uh

00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:33.440
Since that fell out of the curriculum, it hasn't seen the light of day. Okay

00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:41.539
So I want to show you what we can do with that in modern times what that looks like these days

00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:00.879
Okay

00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:05.439
So i'm going to go over to screen sharing you get this lovely fractal pattern

00:08:05.919 --> 00:08:10.258
Uh, but the object that I was describing moments ago is what's called the Peaucellier-Lipkin

00:08:11.340 --> 00:08:13.679
linkage and if we were

00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:17.679
In the same space, I would hand you a physical copy of these I have

00:08:17.979 --> 00:08:21.598
A 3d printed model of one and I want to show you what it does

00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:26.719
So when we move this point here

00:08:32.159 --> 00:08:37.059
What do you observe going on when you see this thing move

00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:47.539
Or you might not start moving that point you might start moving this red point

00:09:01.120 --> 00:09:08.799
Right, so what do we see happening here? Right. We see sort of some kind of relationship between two fundamental shapes this circle

00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:12.000
And this line.

00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:17.200
And it's very mysterious why this is happening. What what do the red bars have to do with this? What do the

00:09:17.839 --> 00:09:19.839
Yellow bars have to do with this?

00:09:21.339 --> 00:09:23.339
Right this was um

00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:26.000
this linkage, uh

00:09:26.160 --> 00:09:32.880
Was sort of a mathematical construct but it had physical applications. So in the uh 1800s, it was a major

00:09:33.600 --> 00:09:37.040
question in mechanics how to convert circular motion

00:09:37.839 --> 00:09:45.839
Into linear motion to say to take a driving pistol at this, um this red point and convert it into a circular motion

00:09:46.399 --> 00:09:48.559
For a wheel or something at this blue point

00:09:49.680 --> 00:09:50.880
okay, so

00:09:50.880 --> 00:09:52.000
uh

00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:53.680
this was this was

00:09:53.680 --> 00:09:59.039
Open people weren't sure how to solve this. Uh this sort of geometry problem. Um,

00:10:00.080 --> 00:10:07.039
Watt, the inventor of steam engines, uh worked on it and wasn't able to come up with a solution. He was able to convert

00:10:07.760 --> 00:10:12.399
Circular motion into uh elliptical motion, right. So if you move the

00:10:13.120 --> 00:10:15.760
Blue points you get an ellipse at the red point

00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:22.578
But it took a uh, Russian graduate student Lipkin and a French mathematician Peaucellier

00:10:23.279 --> 00:10:25.279
uh to invent this linkage

00:10:25.760 --> 00:10:30.799
So usually in a classroom, I would bring in a physical model of this and we'd play around. Um

00:10:31.440 --> 00:10:32.800
and what's

00:10:32.800 --> 00:10:35.459
Interesting about this. Is that our geometry

00:10:36.240 --> 00:10:43.140
Doesn't get us ready to describe what's going on. I've taken this model to a math seminar of undergraduates

00:10:43.920 --> 00:10:46.719
and uh asked them to try and explain what's going on and

00:10:47.519 --> 00:10:52.559
About two hours later. We fill up a couple chalkboards and we still have no idea. So there's

00:10:53.760 --> 00:10:55.740
We really need some

00:10:55.740 --> 00:10:59.140
Classical euclidean geometry to handle this thing. Um

00:11:00.160 --> 00:11:04.399
Giving this talk on the line now. We we can actually play with the model at a sort of a deeper level

00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:07.999
Which is I think very interesting we can adjust the radii of these. Um

00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:12.559
of these things so we can move the uh, yellow

00:11:13.339 --> 00:11:14.480
bars

00:11:14.480 --> 00:11:16.480
so what happens if we make the

00:11:16.800 --> 00:11:18.800
Yellow bars, very big?

00:11:19.360 --> 00:11:21.360
right

00:11:36.560 --> 00:11:38.560
Right, how does the geometry change now

00:11:41.339 --> 00:11:43.339
All right, what do we notice

00:11:43.920 --> 00:11:49.380
Uh, we can change these relative lengths we can we can increase the red lengths as well

00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:58.500
Right, so one advantage to doing this in geogebra

00:11:59.040 --> 00:12:04.639
Instead of a physical model is that we have a fair bit more control we can play around with the various

00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:07.519
parts of the mechanism

00:12:09.519 --> 00:12:13.999
And see how that affects our geometric outcomes

00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:21.459
Right, so one question that this naturally provokes

00:12:22.160 --> 00:12:25.600
Is how much of the blue circle can we get?

00:12:26.399 --> 00:12:34.078
Right. How big can that blue circle get and what would the relationship between that blue circle and that red line be?

00:12:35.920 --> 00:12:38.880
Um as we as we kept varying things

00:12:40.240 --> 00:12:42.579
Okay, so I want to go back to our our slides

00:13:00.160 --> 00:13:02.959
Okay, and we can see that um

00:13:04.639 --> 00:13:07.599
This Peaucellier-Lipkin linkage it is is much more

00:13:08.300 --> 00:13:11.039
Alive and animated than this old

00:13:11.680 --> 00:13:13.680
model in a

00:13:13.839 --> 00:13:15.919
in the Smithsonian gives us right, so

00:13:16.480 --> 00:13:22.420
There's lots to explore with this. There's rich mathematical tasks that could come out of playing with this mechanism

00:13:23.040 --> 00:13:25.040
and uh

00:13:25.040 --> 00:13:29.519
Bringing in a physical copy of these is one thing we can do we can also bring in a virtual copy

00:13:30.220 --> 00:13:37.600
And the virtual copy is a little bit more flexible that we can adjust various bars various lengths, okay

00:13:40.560 --> 00:13:45.440
Another uh object that's very very satisfying to play with and this is a task that you can do

00:13:46.240 --> 00:13:49.199
with any grade, you know all the way from

00:13:49.920 --> 00:13:54.240
Public to post-secondary is you can play with kaleidoscopes. There's lots to

00:13:54.880 --> 00:13:56.720
um explore

00:13:56.720 --> 00:13:58.720
with regards to kaleidoscopes

00:13:59.600 --> 00:14:01.600
They're very very very engaging

00:14:03.199 --> 00:14:08.819
And they get us thinking about symmetry they get us thinking about geometry they get us thinking about transformations

00:14:11.199 --> 00:14:12.720
So, this is a

00:14:12.720 --> 00:14:16.160
physical kaleidoscope and i've often given the talk where

00:14:16.800 --> 00:14:17.680
we

00:14:17.680 --> 00:14:18.560
uh

00:14:18.560 --> 00:14:20.560
We pass around a kaleidoscope

00:14:20.880 --> 00:14:22.800
Various people look at it

00:14:22.800 --> 00:14:29.839
Then we classify all the kaleidoscopes in the plane. We sort of prove a theorem that says what kaleidoscopes can exist

00:14:31.279 --> 00:14:37.279
We talk about the geometry and symmetry of the kaleidoscope and then we hand the kaleidoscopes around again

00:14:37.839 --> 00:14:39.839
and look at them again with

00:14:40.000 --> 00:14:41.680
fresh eyes

00:14:41.680 --> 00:14:43.680
When we look at things with fresh eyes

00:14:44.800 --> 00:14:51.199
And a little bit more mathematical sophistication we can often see a lot more of what's going on. So

00:14:52.399 --> 00:14:58.638
To take an example. We see that this this has this beautiful pattern, but we uh need to investigate

00:14:58.720 --> 00:15:00.720
You know, what? Are these angles here?

00:15:01.279 --> 00:15:03.439
Right when we prove the classification theorem

00:15:05.600 --> 00:15:07.940
We get talking about what these angles are

00:15:15.040 --> 00:15:17.519
What triangle do we really have

00:15:21.680 --> 00:15:24.659
In this region? and uh

00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:31.039
Right. Does this triangle seem familiar to us? What can we deduce?

00:15:31.759 --> 00:15:35.279
About those angles. Um, it turns out this is a

00:15:35.920 --> 00:15:38.639
30 60 90 triangle one of the special triangles

00:15:39.839 --> 00:15:41.839
We can see that

00:15:41.839 --> 00:15:44.239
If we look here if we look at it in its mirror copy

00:15:47.199 --> 00:15:53.839
When we look the first mirror copy of that triangle

00:15:57.120 --> 00:16:04.419
We see we've got an equilateral triangle, right so this angle here has to be this angle here

00:16:08.880 --> 00:16:16.079
And then that gives us that this has to be the same as well, right, we've got a 60 60 60 triangle

00:16:17.440 --> 00:16:25.139
Okay, so there's lots to there's lots to see and vision and kaleidoscopes going into our virtual environment now

00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:39.600
Right we can do the same kind of thing

00:16:40.320 --> 00:16:42.320
uh online virtually

00:16:42.959 --> 00:16:46.879
Right, we can play with with kaleidoscopes and see what happens

00:16:48.639 --> 00:16:50.719
Right, how do those symmetries repeat

00:16:53.120 --> 00:16:58.799
Uh when we go into a reflection right so notice that these

00:17:01.519 --> 00:17:03.519
Purple swirls

00:17:06.720 --> 00:17:08.720
They get copied into all six

00:17:09.839 --> 00:17:11.839
congruent regions

00:17:12.319 --> 00:17:14.319
And one thing I like about this particular app

00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:20.160
Is that every even reflection is colored the same way right so the

00:17:20.799 --> 00:17:25.839
Uh, the first reflection is colored gray. The second reflection is colored purple

00:17:26.240 --> 00:17:31.679
The third reflection is colored gray. The fourth is colored purple. The fifth is colored gray

00:17:31.760 --> 00:17:35.599
The six is colored purple and so on. Okay, this is this is uh,

00:17:36.160 --> 00:17:37.919
quite nice

00:17:37.919 --> 00:17:41.379
Okay, we can play around with different amounts of symmetry

00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:52.640
Right, so again the the the virtual model gives us a little bit more flexibility than the physical model

00:17:55.600 --> 00:17:57.699
Right we can have four-fold symmetry

00:18:04.400 --> 00:18:08.499
We can have eightfold symmetry

00:18:20.559 --> 00:18:25.519
All right, so there's a lot we can do um with these symmetric regions, um

00:18:26.160 --> 00:18:30.079
And I encourage you to uh play around with these a little bit. Um,

00:18:30.640 --> 00:18:32.640
When we're when we're back in

00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:37.919
Uh physical settings. I highly encourage you to get a pair of mirrors

00:18:38.480 --> 00:18:40.880
and bring those to class and experiment with

00:18:42.960 --> 00:18:49.939
Showing your students how the image changes as you vary the angle between the mirrors

00:18:57.679 --> 00:18:59.260
Okay, so

00:18:59.260 --> 00:19:02.079
Kaleidoscopes are a physical object that we can

00:19:02.640 --> 00:19:09.539
Bring in we can ask students to inquire into them. Uh, there's all sorts of connections throughout the curriculum

00:19:10.080 --> 00:19:11.840
and

00:19:11.840 --> 00:19:16.640
I find that we can really see them with with new mathematical eyes when we

00:19:18.559 --> 00:19:20.559
When we ask students to

00:19:21.200 --> 00:19:24.260
Investigate them and then do some kind of math surrounding

00:19:25.200 --> 00:19:29.280
the geometry and symmetry and then look through them again the the experience of

00:19:29.840 --> 00:19:31.840
Sort of leveling up and noticing that

00:19:32.320 --> 00:19:33.200
um

00:19:33.200 --> 00:19:36.740
Say that equilateral triangle is often very powerful for students

00:19:40.720 --> 00:19:42.720
Okay

00:19:44.480 --> 00:19:46.480
This is a piece of art by

00:19:47.840 --> 00:19:49.840
Escher very famous

00:19:50.320 --> 00:19:53.200
artist not a mathematician. Um, but

00:19:53.840 --> 00:19:56.980
Very very deeply aware of the significance and power of mathematics

00:19:57.760 --> 00:19:58.799
and

00:19:58.799 --> 00:20:00.799
What I love about this painting

00:20:01.520 --> 00:20:02.880
is that

00:20:02.880 --> 00:20:07.119
It suggests something but it is not clear what.

00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:12.079
Right, we see this and we say okay, there is some kind of pattern here

00:20:13.280 --> 00:20:16.159
I feel that there is some kind of structure here

00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:19.039
But I don't know what structure it is

00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:22.000
And that's a really powerful moment for our students

00:20:23.120 --> 00:20:25.120
Right, we look at it we can

00:20:25.260 --> 00:20:27.280
Inquire we can ask questions

00:20:27.919 --> 00:20:30.959
And it's not clear what the answers to those questions are

00:20:32.400 --> 00:20:37.599
There's some kind of structure. I don't know what it is, but I wish I did so

00:20:38.880 --> 00:20:40.880
You know some things that you can point out

00:20:44.000 --> 00:20:47.839
Notice here, uh, we've got a point of four-fold symmetry

00:20:51.280 --> 00:20:53.280
Right, we've got a

00:20:54.000 --> 00:20:56.000
Cross there and we can rotate

00:20:56.159 --> 00:21:00.399
If we ignore colors, we can rotate 90 degrees about that center

00:21:01.039 --> 00:21:02.799
if we

00:21:02.799 --> 00:21:06.079
Care about colors. We can rotate 180 degrees about that center

00:21:07.120 --> 00:21:15.059
Over here. We've got a three-fold reflection point a three-fold rotation point but it's not a rotation point of the whole picture

00:21:16.880 --> 00:21:23.359
But this turns us on to the notion that there are squares and there are triangles right here we've got the outline of a square

00:21:29.520 --> 00:21:31.599
And then here we've got the outline of a triangle

00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:40.480
And then a square

00:21:45.600 --> 00:21:47.600
And then a triangle

00:21:47.919 --> 00:21:51.439
All right, this pattern repeats all the way out to the boundary of the region

00:21:53.679 --> 00:21:55.679
We can talk about

00:21:56.700 --> 00:22:02.080
Particular colors come together right here. We've got brown and yellow

00:22:03.840 --> 00:22:05.919
Here we've got another point with brown and yellow

00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:09.440
Here we've got another point with brown and yellow

00:22:10.559 --> 00:22:16.079
And all the way out to the boundary again, so there's lots of patterns that we can look for in this painting

00:22:16.880 --> 00:22:18.880
Or sorry lithograph. Um

00:22:19.679 --> 00:22:22.239
And the more we look for them the more we find them. Um,

00:22:23.200 --> 00:22:29.600
This painting was famously commented on by the Canadian geometer. Uh, Donald Coxeter who

00:22:30.460 --> 00:22:37.679
initially when he saw it thought oh, this is sort of a, you know, a cute thing, uh, sort of a mathematical mistake somehow but

00:22:38.559 --> 00:22:45.199
We'll let it fly and he uh, he didn't think much of the mathematics of it and then about 10 years later

00:22:45.280 --> 00:22:50.399
He looked at it again, and he saw that some of his research was actually embedded in this painting and he didn't even know

00:22:51.120 --> 00:22:52.480
um

00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:58.719
He uh, he noticed that there was a uniform tiling of the hyperbolic plane that he had discovered, uh that was evidenced in this

00:22:58.880 --> 00:23:00.880
uh, and that Escher

00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:03.519
uh didn't know that he had created so

00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:07.299
There's mathematics to be discovered at a very high level

00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:10.400
inside this the

00:23:11.039 --> 00:23:15.999
the sort of closest connection to contemporary mathematics kind of the deepest connection

00:23:16.559 --> 00:23:20.019
Uh would be to the notion of uh hyperbolic geometry

00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:34.000
Which we can explore

00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:38.579
Again, using software we can use hyperbolic we can use software to investigate

00:23:39.600 --> 00:23:41.919
uh sort of these hyperbolic structures

00:23:44.880 --> 00:23:49.839
Right so looking at um this we see that there are these sort of straight lines

00:23:52.480 --> 00:23:54.480
And there are these curved lines

00:23:58.000 --> 00:24:05.760
And in a hyperbolic geometry sense, these are in fact all straight lines in the hyperbolic metric

00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:10.559
Okay from the perspective of those fish in

00:24:11.840 --> 00:24:13.840
Escher's work

00:24:18.799 --> 00:24:20.799
The line AB

00:24:21.919 --> 00:24:25.359
This curved line here AB is just as straight

00:24:27.840 --> 00:24:31.840
As the line EC okay, so from a hyperbolic perspective

00:24:32.720 --> 00:24:40.720
Uh circles become straight lines and we can talk about what properties uh circles have that are in common with straight lines

00:24:41.919 --> 00:24:44.879
both in the euclidean context and in the hyperbolic context

00:24:45.520 --> 00:24:47.520
so this is something where a

00:24:48.880 --> 00:24:51.599
Computer visualization can really show us a lot

00:24:53.120 --> 00:24:57.520
Right, how do these things morph right we had just said that EC is a straight line

00:24:58.799 --> 00:25:00.799
But now suddenly it's become a circle

00:25:02.400 --> 00:25:04.719
But as we move back towards the center of the disk

00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:09.200
EC becomes a straight line again

00:25:12.159 --> 00:25:16.719
So there's a lot to explore, um, there's lots of questions that can be asked here

00:25:18.720 --> 00:25:22.020
And having a conversation about what's going on in this demonstration

00:25:22.720 --> 00:25:26.319
Would give us a lot of insight into what's happening in

00:25:27.340 --> 00:25:28.880
um

00:25:28.880 --> 00:25:30.799
in those uh

00:25:30.799 --> 00:25:32.799
The universe where those fish live

00:25:41.039 --> 00:25:48.259
Okay, so the universe of the these fish is governed not by our usual

00:25:49.740 --> 00:25:51.740
euclidean notions of straight

00:25:54.159 --> 00:25:58.399
But rather by a hyperbolic geometry notion of straight where

00:25:59.419 --> 00:26:02.799
Circles can become straight lines and straight lines can become circles

00:26:03.520 --> 00:26:08.239
So there's lots of there's lots of mathematics to investigate there. And uh, I think that

00:26:08.799 --> 00:26:11.038
You know with a famous piece of art like this

00:26:11.200 --> 00:26:17.760
we have an opportunity to have something that's both aesthetically satisfying and mathematically satisfying so very very

00:26:18.480 --> 00:26:20.740
deep source of conversation

00:26:25.919 --> 00:26:29.839
To bring this, um back to the equity piece. Here's another

00:26:30.480 --> 00:26:34.079
uh piece by Escher and this is modeled on a

00:26:35.039 --> 00:26:37.039
Piece of art that he found in the Alhambra

00:26:38.400 --> 00:26:39.840
And

00:26:39.840 --> 00:26:43.120
This is something that can be constructed with ruler and compass. This is um

00:26:43.919 --> 00:26:45.919
straight euclidean geometry

00:26:46.000 --> 00:26:49.119
Uh, but it's also a place to talk about

00:26:50.640 --> 00:26:52.799
Culture and mathematics and the role that

00:26:53.500 --> 00:26:55.599
Mathematics can play in culture. Um

00:26:56.640 --> 00:27:01.279
You know much Islamic art is geometric and we can talk about why

00:27:02.080 --> 00:27:06.640
Uh that culture has evolved art in that way and what

00:27:07.520 --> 00:27:10.079
What insight geometry can give us into

00:27:11.039 --> 00:27:13.278
Art from different cultures and the beliefs of different cultures

00:27:14.320 --> 00:27:17.200
I think this is a very very satisfying piece. There's lots to look at

00:27:18.159 --> 00:27:19.360
in it

00:27:19.360 --> 00:27:21.839
Uh to try and hunt down where there are

00:27:22.559 --> 00:27:25.778
straight lines that connect up different parts of the diagram

00:27:29.679 --> 00:27:33.699
Right or what how many sides does this thing have

00:27:37.919 --> 00:27:43.379
Or you know that what kinds of symmetry does this have does this have a four-fold rotational symmetry

00:27:45.440 --> 00:27:50.000
Right what parts of the diagram move when we when we look at the symmetries of this object

00:27:51.440 --> 00:27:53.440
And how many

00:27:53.440 --> 00:27:55.440
of these

00:27:55.919 --> 00:27:57.919
Black regions are there?

00:28:00.000 --> 00:28:03.839
And what angle must be between them? What are these little angles here?

00:28:05.760 --> 00:28:07.760
Is this small yellow angle

00:28:09.120 --> 00:28:14.799
The same as the angle at the center if we were to start at the center and go out to the tips of those regions

00:28:15.440 --> 00:28:17.440
Would we have the same angle?

00:28:17.919 --> 00:28:24.499
So one can produce photocopies of this diagram and go about investigating these things with rulers and protractors

00:28:25.520 --> 00:28:27.520
and engage with the

00:28:28.640 --> 00:28:34.559
Some classical Islamic art and there's also uh constructions that you can you can do based off this so you can

00:28:35.120 --> 00:28:42.260
Get your compass and protractor and ruler and build out some of these things. Um as a geometry lesson

00:28:47.520 --> 00:28:51.439
There's lots and lots and lots of resources on uh teaching inquiry

00:28:52.159 --> 00:28:58.319
Or sorry teaching geometry with inquiry. I highly encourage you to look up these resources. Um

00:28:59.279 --> 00:29:02.319
All of them have activities that could be used in the public school

00:29:03.360 --> 00:29:05.360
setting the high school setting

00:29:06.880 --> 00:29:09.599
There's lots and lots of lots of things to explore

00:29:10.960 --> 00:29:14.399
In geometry, and it can be explored at many different levels. Okay, so

00:29:15.520 --> 00:29:18.179
I want to close off this uh this presentation

00:29:18.880 --> 00:29:25.699
Uh, just with a reminder that you know students come first, uh, there's many many things that we can do with students

00:29:27.279 --> 00:29:31.679
To help them explore geometry to find their way into geometry. Um,

00:29:32.720 --> 00:29:35.360
It's a satisfying exercise to both

00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:38.240
notice how happy these people are

00:29:38.720 --> 00:29:45.839
How much is going on and how many geometric objects there are on the table? Where can you find geometry on this table? So

00:29:47.039 --> 00:29:50.398
Thank you for taking the time to uh, listen to this presentation

00:29:51.520 --> 00:29:53.520
if you have any

00:29:53.600 --> 00:29:56.880
comments or questions about the presentation I encourage you to

00:29:57.679 --> 00:30:02.079
reach out on Twitter or by email I'd be happy to

00:30:02.880 --> 00:30:10.559
To talk with you about geometry mathematics for the eyes and hands and hopefully in the future going forward

00:30:11.039 --> 00:30:14.158
To share some models with you and to share some exploration

00:30:14.880 --> 00:30:18.739
Thank you very much. I hope you enjoy the rest of OAME. It's been a pleasure

